Fine Guns
I was
delighted to come across the article written by Capt. Paul
Curtis in the early
30’s
on the number of advantages of owning and shooting a fine
gun because, 30-odd years later, I also penned some articles
on this subject.
One
finds it difficult indeed to understand just why, in this
most affluent period of our history, the average American
male, while loudly professing to have a genuine, even
passionate, interest in guns and hunting, is so all-fired
reluctant to invest in a really fine gun.
I use the term “fine” rather than “good” for,
as Capt. Curtis pointed out, the average cheap shotgun will
shoot as far and as “hard” as the most costly.
The appeal and the value of the more expensive
scattergun, what the English call a “best” Gun,
therefore must be found in some other aspect of its
performance than in its mere ability to simply kill a
pheasant, a duck or a rabbit.
Any motor car will get you from point A to point B,
but few drivers are so unperceptive as to fail to understand
that a Bentley, a Cadillac, a Mercedes-Benz or a Ferrari
provides a level of transportation which is quite different
than is experienced by the use of an Austin, a Ford, a VW or
a Fiat 600. Best
is best. A
“Prime” steak is tastier and costs more than a cheap,
and invariably tough cut.
Well, a truly fine gun nourishes the soul of a man as
does no cheap made-only-to-sell-at-a-price model.
So
we enter the realm of the intangible, the not clearly
defined area where a superbly made tool, or similar
utilitarian object, approaches, possibly even becomes, a
work of art. And
I submit that any sensitive person with a genuine
appreciation for materials, for craftsmanship and for beauty
of line must admit that a high grade double barreled shotgun
is a far more honest “work of art” than is most of the
welded junk and
smeared
canvases regularly displayed with insulting seriousness by
Guggenheim! Although
they have not seen fit to actually display a Purdey, or the
locks of a Westley-Richards, the Museum of Modern Art has
shown its appreciation for this high level of
functional
design and craftsmanship by displaying such sporting items
as a Bugatti and a Randall hunting knife.
The New York Metropolitan Museum of Art has a
permanent display of truly magnificent firearms of all
types—including a fine modern double as well as that
incredible double-barreled flintlock shotgun made for
Napoleon by Nicolas Boutet (with a matching set of
percussion locks and barrels).
Capt. Curtis seemed to doubt that many hunters really
understood or appreciated the higher grade firearms, but it
has been my experience that most people, even non-shooters,
immediately do react to both the beauty and workmanship of
these guns as well as to their balance—but shake their
heads in disbelief, or profess to be horrified, that anyone
would be willing to pay the price guns of this quality cost.
Lest anyone think my own collection is full of
$10,000.00 guns let me hasten to point out that even an
$5,000.00 Darne or a $2,000.00 Sarasqueta has the same
effect on most people!
Even enthusiastic and experienced shooters usually
feel that there is something verging upon the immoral about
shelling out $2,500.00 to $5,000.00 dollars for a
gun—something akin to taking up with a fancy lady and
leaving the family behind to creep over the hill to the
poorhouse!
It
seems to me that we American men have been rather
effectively brainwashed to accept as Gospel that we were put
here on earth for the sole purpose of slaving away to
provide the “good life” for the family—and if we want
anything specifically for ourselves it had better be limited
to something practical like a power lawn mower (or a new
razor).
It
is downright appalling to find men who really do enjoy
hunting hesitate to replace a beatup, ugly, badly balanced
piece of junk, which was trash when they bought it for a few
dollars only 10 years ago, with even a moderately priced,
medium grade gun costing $2,500.00-$3,500.00, which they can
very well afford. The
thought of getting something in the $4,000.00-$5,000.00
range (much less $15,000.00-$20,000.00) never enters their
minds, even though they never seem to hesitate to add
$4,000.00 or more in extra alone when buying a new family
station wagon that is going to be resting on a junk heap in
8 to 10 years, even though it did cost anywhere from
$25,000.00 to $75,000.00.
Why
is it perfectly respectable, and even approved by society as
well as one’s bank, to go repeatedly into hock for many
thousands of dollars for transportation which is subject to
fantastically rapid obsolescence and depreciation, but
irrational and irresponsible for a man to only once invest
an almost similar sum in an object which can be used for a
lifetime, without continued and expensive repairs, and be
virtually guaranteed to be worth as much, if not more, after
30 or even 50 years! As
I said, even the cost of the extras found on the average car
purchased today would add up to enough to get a man a far
better than average gun.
The
Stoeger catalog for 1929 lists the Parker A1 Special for
$750.00. –today, used but well treated, that gun must be
worth at least 30 times that figure while any $32.00 mass
produced repeater of that year would be hard to even give
away.
Don’t
you wish your old man had “squandered” $600.00 back in
1929 on those fine Merkles with the detachable locks—the
only similar gun made today is a $17,000.00
Holland
and Holland.
That
Year, 1929, you will note that you could have acquired a
Crown Grade LC Smith for $266.75 which would surely be worth
close to $6,000.00 now, after 40 years of use.
Even
in the 1930’s a standard Winchester Model with single
trigger and automatic ejectors cost a mere $111.25!
How much better an investment than a $37.50 repeater
do you reckon such a gun was?
Today’s shooters look askance at the price tag of a
DIANA Grade Browning O-U and consider the purchase of such a
$3,500.00 gun a madly impractical idea—as no doubt did
most shooters in 1939 when the “Bible” carried this
model at $218.00! What
did anyone buy in 1939 for $218.00 that today is worth more
than it cost after giving 30 years of service?
A fancy radio? The
sofa and chair? The
rug in the living room?
Ha, all that stuff was almost certainly thrown away
40 years ago! Just
as your present $2,000.00 color TV set, your $1,500.00 CD,
and most of your $1,200.00 kitchen equipment will all be
junk in another 10 years (after costing how much in
repairs). While
a really fine gun bought today, at what seems like a high
price, will steadily go up in value and give you pleasure
every day that you look at it on the rack or handle it.
My
heart bleeds for the poor bastard who works himself steadily
toward the grave (whether wearing a white collar or a blue
one) in a dreary job just so his family can have everything
they “need”, including
TV in every room and a $20,000.00 Mustang for his
high school kid, but is ashamed to spend more than a
pittance for something he himself would deeply appreciate as
a MAN—a damn good shotgun (or rifle).
Let daughter
go off to college on a bus instead of in her own VW, to heck
with adding that “family room” (do you really need or
want half the neighborhood kids in your house every
night)—for a change, consider your needs and desires
(it’s time someone did), for you deserve at least one
thing you can call your own, besides that can of beer, and
for once it ought to be something of lasting quality and
value. And if
you end up feeling slightly conscious-stricken, cheer up,
your grandson will love and respect you all the more
SOURCE
OF THIS ARTICLE UNKNOWN TO ME.